Threats / Progress / CVE-2024-4358
CVE-2024-4358
· EUVD no mirror located
· GCVE no mirror located
Verified 2026-08-04
Progress Telerik Report Server vulnerability
Progress Telerik Report Server contains an authorization bypass vulnerability allowing attackers to spoof authentication and gain unauthorized access to the application.
Verdict
Today item — known-exploited.
An attacker can bypass authorization controls in Telerik Report Server through spoofing techniques, obtaining unauthorized access to sensitive reporting functionality and data without valid credentials.
CISA KEV Yes · 2024-06-135EPSS 0.97482 (verify live)6Exploit Weaponized · public PoC7CVSS 9.83CISA SSVC Exploitation: active · Automatable: yes · Impact: total4
01
Is it exploitable?
— the evidence, ranked above the scoreExploit available
Fully weaponized — public exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
482 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2024-06-13).
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.97482 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
CVSS 9.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) · Affected: Progress, Telerik Report Server. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.CVSS — CNA-assigned (CVE.org), version 3.1, set at disclosure.
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-290 Auth Bypass by Spoofing — weakness family: Authentication.CWE — CNA-assigned (CVE.org); the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
CISA SSVC (triage disposition)
Exploitation: active · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: totalCISA's own stakeholder-specific triage inputs, published in the CVE record (CISA Coordinator role). NOTE: this is CISA's three decision points; the final Act/Attend/Track decision also requires a Mission & Well-being input not published here, so no overall decision is asserted.
Currency of the record
CISA added this to its KEV catalog 15 days after the CVE record was published.KEV lag = CISA-KEV dateAdded − CVE.org datePublished; a floor on how long the known-exploited flaw sat in the public record before the federal catalog listed it. Severity/weakness here is CNA- or CISA-assigned (current at disclosure), independent of NVD's analysis backlog.
Public exploit available
Public exploit tooling is catalogued for this CVE (a functional/weaponized public exploit). Catalog entries: Metasploit module, nuclei template. We link the catalog page(s) only — no payload or code is hosted or restated here.Link, never host — the catalog page is the source; basicsecurity.net does not redistribute payloads.
02
Who’s exploiting it?
— attribution turns risk into urgencyAttribution not established
No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.
03
Why it matters
— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board1
Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1
Attacker
I craft a malicious request that spoofs authentication credentials or session tokens to bypass authorization checks.
Business
Unauthorized users gain direct access to the report server, exposing confidential business intelligence and operational data.
2
Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2
Attacker
I escalate privileges by impersonating legitimate administrators or service accounts within the application.
Business
Attackers obtain administrative capabilities, enabling modification or deletion of critical reports and system configurations.
3
Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3
Attacker
I extract sensitive data from reports and databases accessible through the compromised server instance.
Business
Confidential business metrics, customer information, and financial data are exfiltrated, creating compliance and reputational damage.
04
What to do
— defensible action- Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05
Coverage & confidence
— what we know, and what we don’tEstablished (cited)
Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden
Disclosure & credit2
Catalogued by ProgressSoftwareCNA