basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Synacor / CVE-2022-24682
CVE-2022-24682 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-08-04

Synacor Zimbra Collaborate Suite (ZCS) vulnerability

Synacor Zimbra Collaborate Suite contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Calendar feature allowing arbitrary code execution. The flaw is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns.

Verdict

Today item, not a backlog item.

A stored or reflected XSS in the Calendar component permits attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in victim browsers with user privileges. Active exploitation in ransomware operations indicates high real-world risk despite no CVSS score assignment.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-02-254Ransomware use Flagged4EPSS 0.3106 (verify live)5CVSS 6.1 (CISA)3CISA SSVC Exploitation: active · Automatable: no · Impact: partial3Exploit Public PoC / detection · nuclei template11
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
12 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-02-25), flagged for known ransomware use.
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.3106 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
CVSS 6.1 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N) · Affected: Synacor, Zimbra Collaborate Suite (ZCS). Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.CVSS — CISA-assigned via the ADP container (CVE.org), version 3.1; the CNA left no metrics, so CISA's own score is used ahead of NVD.
CISA-ADP ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-79 Cross-site Scripting (XSS), CWE-116 CWE-116 — weakness family: Web / client.CWE assignment from the public NVD record (may be stale); the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
CISA SSVC (triage disposition)
Exploitation: active · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialCISA's own stakeholder-specific triage inputs, published in the CVE record (CISA Coordinator role). NOTE: this is CISA's three decision points; the final Act/Attend/Track decision also requires a Mission & Well-being input not published here, so no overall decision is asserted.
CISA-ADP ↗Reported
Currency of the record
CISA added this to its KEV catalog 16 days after the CVE record was published.KEV lag = CISA-KEV dateAdded − CVE.org datePublished; a floor on how long the known-exploited flaw sat in the public record before the federal catalog listed it. Severity/weakness here is CNA- or CISA-assigned (current at disclosure), independent of NVD's analysis backlog.
Public exploit available
Public exploit tooling is catalogued for this CVE (a public proof-of-concept / detection template). Catalog entries: nuclei template. We link the catalog page(s) only — no payload or code is hosted or restated here.Link, never host — the catalog page is the source; basicsecurity.net does not redistribute payloads.
nuclei ↗Confirmed
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious calendar event or link containing JavaScript payload targeting Zimbra users.
Business
Attackers gain initial code execution within the user's browser session and trusted domain context.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I execute arbitrary actions as the logged-in user, such as stealing session tokens or modifying calendar data.
Business
User accounts are compromised, enabling lateral movement and persistence within the organization.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I deploy ransomware payloads or establish command-and-control callbacks from compromised endpoints.
Business
Systems are encrypted or exfiltrated; operations halt and ransom demands follow.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • Ransomware-use flag (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 12 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CVSS 6.1 — CISA-assigned (CVE.org ADP)
  • CISA SSVC triage disposition (CVE.org ADP)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD feed — CNA left none)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.