Threats / VMware Tanzu / CVE-2018-1273
CVE-2018-1273
· EUVD no mirror located
· GCVE no mirror located
Verified 2026-08-04
VMware Tanzu Spring Data Commons vulnerability
Spring Data Commons property binder vulnerability allows remote code execution through unsafe object binding, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected systems.
Verdict
Today item, not a backlog item.
A critical remote code execution flaw in Spring Data Commons property binding mechanisms permits unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code. Active exploitation and ransomware deployment have been observed in the wild.
CISA KEV Yes · 2022-03-255Ransomware use Flagged5EPSS 0.95649 (verify live)6Exploit Weaponized · public PoC7CVSS 9.8 (CISA)4CISA SSVC Exploitation: active · Automatable: yes · Impact: total4
01
Is it exploitable?
— the evidence, ranked above the scoreExploit available
Fully weaponized — public exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
729 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-25), flagged for known ransomware use.
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.95649 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
CVSS 9.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) · Affected: VMware Tanzu, Spring Data Commons. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.CVSS — CISA-assigned via the ADP container (CVE.org), version 3.1; the CNA left no metrics, so CISA's own score is used ahead of NVD.
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-94 Code Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE — CNA-assigned (CVE.org); the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
CISA SSVC (triage disposition)
Exploitation: active · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: totalCISA's own stakeholder-specific triage inputs, published in the CVE record (CISA Coordinator role). NOTE: this is CISA's three decision points; the final Act/Attend/Track decision also requires a Mission & Well-being input not published here, so no overall decision is asserted.
Currency of the record
CISA added this to its KEV catalog 1444 days after the CVE record was published.KEV lag = CISA-KEV dateAdded − CVE.org datePublished; a floor on how long the known-exploited flaw sat in the public record before the federal catalog listed it. Severity/weakness here is CNA- or CISA-assigned (current at disclosure), independent of NVD's analysis backlog.
Public exploit available
Public exploit tooling is catalogued for this CVE (a public proof-of-concept / detection template). Catalog entries: nuclei template. We link the catalog page(s) only — no payload or code is hosted or restated here.Link, never host — the catalog page is the source; basicsecurity.net does not redistribute payloads.
02
Who’s exploiting it?
— attribution turns risk into urgencyAttribution not established
No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.
03
Why it matters
— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board1
Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1
Attacker
I craft a malicious request containing code-execution payloads targeting the property binder.
Business
Attacker gains code execution capability on the vulnerable application server.
2
Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2
Attacker
I establish persistence and lateral movement within the compromised infrastructure.
Business
Attacker expands foothold across internal systems and data repositories.
3
Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3
Attacker
I deploy ransomware or exfiltrate sensitive data from the organization.
Business
Operations halt, data confidentiality is breached, and ransom demands or regulatory fines follow.
04
What to do
— defensible action- Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05