Threats / Microsoft / CVE-2015-2425
CVE-2015-2425
· EUVD no mirror located
· GCVE no mirror located
Verified 2026-08-04
Microsoft Internet Explorer vulnerability
Microsoft Internet Explorer contains a memory corruption vulnerability allowing remote code execution or denial-of-service attacks.
Verdict
Today item — known-exploited.
A memory corruption flaw in Internet Explorer enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or disrupt service. The vulnerability has been exploited in active attacks and carries moderate exploitability risk.
CISA KEV Yes · 2022-05-254EPSS 0.44851 (verify live)5CVSS 8.8 (CISA)3CISA SSVC Exploitation: active · Automatable: no · Impact: total3
01
Is it exploitable?
— the evidence, ranked above the scoreReported exploitation
3 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-25).
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.44851 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
CVSS 8.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) · Affected: Microsoft, Internet Explorer. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.CVSS — CISA-assigned via the ADP container (CVE.org), version 3.1; the CNA left no metrics, so CISA's own score is used ahead of NVD.
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-119 Memory Buffer Bounds Error — weakness family: Memory safety.CWE assignment from the public NVD record (may be stale); the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
CISA SSVC (triage disposition)
Exploitation: active · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalCISA's own stakeholder-specific triage inputs, published in the CVE record (CISA Coordinator role). NOTE: this is CISA's three decision points; the final Act/Attend/Track decision also requires a Mission & Well-being input not published here, so no overall decision is asserted.
Currency of the record
CISA added this to its KEV catalog 2507 days after the CVE record was published.KEV lag = CISA-KEV dateAdded − CVE.org datePublished; a floor on how long the known-exploited flaw sat in the public record before the federal catalog listed it. Severity/weakness here is CNA- or CISA-assigned (current at disclosure), independent of NVD's analysis backlog.
02
Who’s exploiting it?
— attribution turns risk into urgencyAttribution not established
No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.
03
Why it matters
— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board1
Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1
Attacker
Craft a malicious webpage or email containing specially formatted content that triggers memory corruption when processed by Internet Explorer.
Business
Users visiting compromised or attacker-controlled websites face immediate risk of system compromise or service disruption.
2
Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2
Attacker
Deliver the exploit payload through web browsing, requiring no user interaction beyond visiting a malicious page.
Business
Attack surface spans all Internet Explorer users, including those on unpatched systems within enterprise networks.
3
Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3
Attacker
Execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the affected user or trigger denial-of-service conditions.
Business
Successful exploitation leads to data theft, malware installation, lateral movement, or operational disruption.
04
What to do
— defensible action- Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05