Threats / Microsoft / CVE-2013-2551
CVE-2013-2551
· EUVD no mirror located
· GCVE no mirror located
Verified 2026-08-04
Microsoft Internet Explorer vulnerability
Use-after-free vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer allows remote code execution through crafted websites. Actively exploited in the wild and associated with ransomware campaigns.
Verdict
Today item, not a backlog item.
A use-after-free flaw in Internet Explorer enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by triggering access to freed memory objects via malicious web content. High exploitation prevalence and ransomware deployment indicate severe operational risk.
CISA KEV Yes · 2022-03-284Ransomware use Flagged4EPSS 0.74096 (verify live)5CVSS 8.8 (CISA)3CISA SSVC Exploitation: active · Automatable: no · Impact: total3Exploit Weaponized · public exploit · Metasploit module11
01
Is it exploitable?
— the evidence, ranked above the scoreReported exploitation
10 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-28), flagged for known ransomware use.
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.74096 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
CVSS 8.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) · Affected: Microsoft, Internet Explorer. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.CVSS — CISA-assigned via the ADP container (CVE.org), version 3.1; the CNA left no metrics, so CISA's own score is used ahead of NVD.
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-416 Use After Free — weakness family: Memory safety.CWE assignment from the public NVD record (may be stale); the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
CISA SSVC (triage disposition)
Exploitation: active · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalCISA's own stakeholder-specific triage inputs, published in the CVE record (CISA Coordinator role). NOTE: this is CISA's three decision points; the final Act/Attend/Track decision also requires a Mission & Well-being input not published here, so no overall decision is asserted.
Currency of the record
CISA added this to its KEV catalog 3304 days after the CVE record was published.KEV lag = CISA-KEV dateAdded − CVE.org datePublished; a floor on how long the known-exploited flaw sat in the public record before the federal catalog listed it. Severity/weakness here is CNA- or CISA-assigned (current at disclosure), independent of NVD's analysis backlog.
Public exploit available
Public exploit tooling is catalogued for this CVE (a functional/weaponized public exploit). Catalog entries: Metasploit module. We link the catalog page(s) only — no payload or code is hosted or restated here.Link, never host — the catalog page is the source; basicsecurity.net does not redistribute payloads.
02
Who’s exploiting it?
— attribution turns risk into urgencyAttribution not established
No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.
03
Why it matters
— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board1
Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1
Attacker
Craft a malicious webpage that causes Internet Explorer to access a previously freed object in memory.
Business
Endpoint compromise and potential lateral movement into enterprise networks via browser-based attack vector.
2
Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2
Attacker
Achieve code execution with the privileges of the browsing user upon successful exploitation.
Business
Data theft, credential harvesting, or establishment of persistent backdoor access for follow-on attacks.
3
Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3
Attacker
Deploy ransomware payload or join compromised systems into botnet infrastructure.
Business
Operational disruption, financial extortion, and potential regulatory compliance violations from data exposure.
04
What to do
— defensible action- Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05